Definition: And it came to pass in the fourth year of king Darius, [that] the word of the LORD came unto Zechariah in the fourth [day] of the ninth month, [even] in Chisleu;
Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from Zechariah 7:1. It’s a really interesting and somewhat mysterious passage from the Old Testament. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: Basically, it says that God sent a message to Zechariah very early in King Darius’ reign. Here's a breakdown of each part: “And it came to pass…” : This is just a way of saying "It happened." It sets the stage for something significant. “…in the fourth year of king Darius…” : This tells us who sent the message – King Darius, who was the ruler of Persia (modern-day Iran). He's the person in charge at this time. “[that] the word of the LORD came unto Zechariah…” : This is crucial! "The word of the Lord" refers to God speaking and revealing His will. It means that God was communicating something important. “…in the fourth [day] of the ninth month…” : This is where it gets a little tricky. “Fourth” here means “fourth day.” The ninth month is a specific time in the Hebrew calendar. So, this refers to the fourth day of the ninth month. It’s a precise date. “[even] in Chisleu” : “Chisleu” was a city near present-day Tehran, Iran. It's where Zechariah was located. This indicates that the message was delivered to this specific location. What does it mean ? The Bible often uses symbolic language. Some scholars believe this verse is about a period of intense, possibly unsettling, turmoil in Persia under Darius. The message might have been about the future – perhaps warnings or instructions regarding a potential war or disaster. It’s not a straightforward narrative, but it points to a significant moment of divine communication and preparation for something important. Important Note: This is an ancient text, and interpretations can vary over time. It's a fascinating piece of history and symbolism that continues to be debated by scholars. --- Do you want me to: Explain a specific aspect of the verse in more detail? Discuss possible interpretations of what it might have meant?